Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Marlow Wilson" data-source="post: 26490" data-attributes="member: 47">Re: Desparity in specification: PRX618S-XLF vs VRX918SP&nbsp;His post, as I read it, was not meant to be condescending to you but rather reflect the fairly basic criteria of the SOS rental market.&nbsp; The disregard for acceptability is through the eyes of the client and if there was any condescension, it was towards the average rental client and not the provider.&nbsp;&nbsp; I&#039;m sure Tom does care, and I myself have had success approaching small scale production from a client perspective.&nbsp; It&#039;s the difference between telling them what they need and understanding what they want with the hope of reconciling that with what they need.&nbsp; Marginal differences in subwoofer performance tend not to come up in these evaluations, which I think was Tom&#039;s point. One other advantage with the VRX over the PRX is that the previous PRX sub was less than stellar.&nbsp; The new PRX stuff may bring with it some of the stigma of the older products among professional or quasi-professional users.&nbsp; I think you&#039;ll be happy with the VRX performance (**though I haven&#039;t heard the new PRX so I have no reference point**) but I tend to think that both are very close together in the otherwise large spectrum of possible SR subs.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Marlow Wilson, post: 26490, member: 47"] Re: Desparity in specification: PRX618S-XLF vs VRX918SP His post, as I read it, was not meant to be condescending to you but rather reflect the fairly basic criteria of the SOS rental market. The disregard for acceptability is through the eyes of the client and if there was any condescension, it was towards the average rental client and not the provider. I'm sure Tom does care, and I myself have had success approaching small scale production from a client perspective. It's the difference between telling them what they need and understanding what they want with the hope of reconciling that with what they need. Marginal differences in subwoofer performance tend not to come up in these evaluations, which I think was Tom's point. One other advantage with the VRX over the PRX is that the previous PRX sub was less than stellar. The new PRX stuff may bring with it some of the stigma of the older products among professional or quasi-professional users. I think you'll be happy with the VRX performance (**though I haven't heard the new PRX so I have no reference point**) but I tend to think that both are very close together in the otherwise large spectrum of possible SR subs. [/QUOTE]

Verification