Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Do you interpret "required SPL" on riders as A or C weighting?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Scott Bolt" data-source="post: 100373" data-attributes="member: 3950"><p>Re: Do you interpret "required SPL" on riders as A or C weighting?</p><p></p><p><span style="color: #333333"></span></p><p><span style="color: #333333">LOL. Yes, it is a largely meaningless number. Regardless of the weighting, it is a weighting. You could have a ton of ice-pick-in-your-ear frequency and nothing else and it would still read a high SPL.</span></p><p><span style="color: #333333"></span></p><p><span style="color: #333333">Point taken.</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Scott Bolt, post: 100373, member: 3950"] Re: Do you interpret "required SPL" on riders as A or C weighting? [COLOR=#333333] LOL. Yes, it is a largely meaningless number. Regardless of the weighting, it is a weighting. You could have a ton of ice-pick-in-your-ear frequency and nothing else and it would still read a high SPL. Point taken.[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Do you interpret "required SPL" on riders as A or C weighting?
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!
