Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Do you interpret "required SPL" on riders as A or C weighting?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Per Søvik" data-source="post: 100440" data-attributes="member: 1285"><p>Re: Do you interpret "required SPL" on riders as A or C weighting?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Waivers are not necessarily doing you any good, unless it is signed at the time of entering into the "contract", and when there is a risk of injury from passively taking part, the value of the waiver is a lot less than when the participant is active and is the primary person to influence the risk of the activity.</p><p>One could argue that providing a system capable of more than 105dBA continous is irresponsible and negligent, and therefore refuse, but then every provider would have to do so, and that wouldn't suit the big ones with new, big and powerful rigs capable of a lot more.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Per Søvik, post: 100440, member: 1285"] Re: Do you interpret "required SPL" on riders as A or C weighting? Waivers are not necessarily doing you any good, unless it is signed at the time of entering into the "contract", and when there is a risk of injury from passively taking part, the value of the waiver is a lot less than when the participant is active and is the primary person to influence the risk of the activity. One could argue that providing a system capable of more than 105dBA continous is irresponsible and negligent, and therefore refuse, but then every provider would have to do so, and that wouldn't suit the big ones with new, big and powerful rigs capable of a lot more. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Do you interpret "required SPL" on riders as A or C weighting?
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!
