Normal
Re: Do you interpret "required SPL" on riders as A or C weighting?Waivers are not necessarily doing you any good, unless it is signed at the time of entering into the "contract", and when there is a risk of injury from passively taking part, the value of the waiver is a lot less than when the participant is active and is the primary person to influence the risk of the activity.One could argue that providing a system capable of more than 105dBA continous is irresponsible and negligent, and therefore refuse, but then every provider would have to do so, and that wouldn't suit the big ones with new, big and powerful rigs capable of a lot more.
Re: Do you interpret "required SPL" on riders as A or C weighting?
Waivers are not necessarily doing you any good, unless it is signed at the time of entering into the "contract", and when there is a risk of injury from passively taking part, the value of the waiver is a lot less than when the participant is active and is the primary person to influence the risk of the activity.
One could argue that providing a system capable of more than 105dBA continous is irresponsible and negligent, and therefore refuse, but then every provider would have to do so, and that wouldn't suit the big ones with new, big and powerful rigs capable of a lot more.
