Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Do you interpret "required SPL" on riders as A or C weighting?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Marsellus Fariss" data-source="post: 8382" data-attributes="member: 1107"><p>Most of the tech riders I see come through here have "PA must be able to maintain 115db undistorted at mix position" and some have been absurdly high like 130db. Rarely if ever is there a weighting specified which is silly to me. What's the deal? A or C?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Marsellus Fariss, post: 8382, member: 1107"] Most of the tech riders I see come through here have "PA must be able to maintain 115db undistorted at mix position" and some have been absurdly high like 130db. Rarely if ever is there a weighting specified which is silly to me. What's the deal? A or C? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Do you interpret "required SPL" on riders as A or C weighting?
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!