Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Installs
Ease Vs Ulysses vs anything else
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ben Gingerich" data-source="post: 108128" data-attributes="member: 2579"><p>Re: Ease Vs Ulysses vs anything else</p><p></p><p>95% of the time I'm looking for direct coverage area/speaker placement. 4% of the time pretty pictures for the customer and 1% of the time acoustic simulations.</p><p>I have noticed in the past that different manufactures use junk numbers. The first "big design" (in my mind) I did 8+ years ago when a new line/J array came out and I put it in ease and it looked really good, the owner of the company I worked for was able to get a full demo, brought in lifts and everything, the sls920s the owner of my company had used for years for his rental system he spec'ed out, they did not look near as good on the design so he brought them as well, I may or may not have let my 18year old big mouth talk about how much better my new array was going to be than his point and shoot stuff, let's just say that I pushed brooms cases and tool boxes and sat behind a bunch of 6chan powered mixers for another year after that. </p><p></p><p>However its still good to have the placement and ball park numbers when your doing a design again that's 95% of what I need. </p><p>The next install I'm doing is just a 2cab install and I have the budget to do it right so I was able to use DDT to give the customer pretty pictures.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ben Gingerich, post: 108128, member: 2579"] Re: Ease Vs Ulysses vs anything else 95% of the time I'm looking for direct coverage area/speaker placement. 4% of the time pretty pictures for the customer and 1% of the time acoustic simulations. I have noticed in the past that different manufactures use junk numbers. The first "big design" (in my mind) I did 8+ years ago when a new line/J array came out and I put it in ease and it looked really good, the owner of the company I worked for was able to get a full demo, brought in lifts and everything, the sls920s the owner of my company had used for years for his rental system he spec'ed out, they did not look near as good on the design so he brought them as well, I may or may not have let my 18year old big mouth talk about how much better my new array was going to be than his point and shoot stuff, let's just say that I pushed brooms cases and tool boxes and sat behind a bunch of 6chan powered mixers for another year after that. However its still good to have the placement and ball park numbers when your doing a design again that's 95% of what I need. The next install I'm doing is just a 2cab install and I have the budget to do it right so I was able to use DDT to give the customer pretty pictures. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Installs
Ease Vs Ulysses vs anything else
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!