Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
FIR filters
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mark Wilkinson" data-source="post: 147973" data-attributes="member: 8989"><p>Re: FIR filters</p><p></p><p>OK guys, please don't shoot me for dumbing things down....you have a wonderful discussion going....</p><p></p><p>But thinking about aligning subs to mains and and FIR latency..... it seems that FIR latency has to be at least equal to the group delay of the subs at LP crossover frequency as per IIR........???</p><p></p><p></p><p>When we phase align subs to mains, I keep getting that means using a group delay implicit within the phase alignment freq range. Correct? </p><p>(BTW, on an impulse response the group delay timing looks to me to be found on the <em>second</em> peak, not on the first peak where all the energy and no phase lag exists, yes?) (And is there a hotkey way to toggle between phase and group delay in Smaart?</p><p></p><p>Anyway, in case I'm barking anywhere near the right tree........say I've got a sub high passed at 30hz 4th order, and LP'ed at 100hz 4th order... the filters alone give a group delay of about 7ms at 100hz, and 20ms or so at 40hz....plus there's the inherent increasing delay of the driver as it goes lower... could easily end up with 30 or more ms delay at lowest freq.</p><p></p><p>Seems like FIR has to account for this group delay however low we choose to try to flatten phase.</p><p></p><p>So if we want to flatten phase much below sub LP, doesn't latency become unacceptable for almost any app except maybe pure playback?</p><p>Do we just ignore this increasing sub lag below x-over? Whether IIR or FIR?</p><p></p><p>If we could live with the latency to get phase flat to 20-30 hz, how many dang taps would it take? THX</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mark Wilkinson, post: 147973, member: 8989"] Re: FIR filters OK guys, please don't shoot me for dumbing things down....you have a wonderful discussion going.... But thinking about aligning subs to mains and and FIR latency..... it seems that FIR latency has to be at least equal to the group delay of the subs at LP crossover frequency as per IIR........??? When we phase align subs to mains, I keep getting that means using a group delay implicit within the phase alignment freq range. Correct? (BTW, on an impulse response the group delay timing looks to me to be found on the [I]second[/I] peak, not on the first peak where all the energy and no phase lag exists, yes?) (And is there a hotkey way to toggle between phase and group delay in Smaart? Anyway, in case I'm barking anywhere near the right tree........say I've got a sub high passed at 30hz 4th order, and LP'ed at 100hz 4th order... the filters alone give a group delay of about 7ms at 100hz, and 20ms or so at 40hz....plus there's the inherent increasing delay of the driver as it goes lower... could easily end up with 30 or more ms delay at lowest freq. Seems like FIR has to account for this group delay however low we choose to try to flatten phase. So if we want to flatten phase much below sub LP, doesn't latency become unacceptable for almost any app except maybe pure playback? Do we just ignore this increasing sub lag below x-over? Whether IIR or FIR? If we could live with the latency to get phase flat to 20-30 hz, how many dang taps would it take? THX [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
FIR filters
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!