Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
FIR filters
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Raimonds Skuruls" data-source="post: 207326" data-attributes="member: 9926"><p>Hi Mark,</p><p></p><p>Thank you for your thoughts!</p><p></p><p>I am advocating the use of less ringing (less group delay) minimum phase filters as LR24 for example. They are taking just half of taps as necessary for linear phase filters. Then you can add time correction filter to make that crossover linear phase if you like. It takes just12 ms (and respective number of taps) as in previous example.</p><p>You can have on hand two presets – one with zero latency by with some group delay,</p><p>another - with linear phase (flat group delay) but with some few ms of latency.</p><p></p><p>When we are using linear phase filters we are hoping that ringing of one filter will be compensated by ringing of other filter next to it – ringings are out of phase.</p><p>It is very utopia hope. As you now, we can use two loudspeakers out of phase but will never get complete compensation of sounds of each other.</p><p>Especial, in case when loudspeakers have different construction.</p><p>We need to use a correction to make they transfer as identical as possible to go close to that task as possible.</p><p>But, if we can use a correction, we do not need to use steep (ringing) filters and the risk of audibility of filter ringing is much less.</p><p></p><p>All APL solutions (units, plugin) are supporting WAV format FIRs to be uploaded to them.</p><p></p><p>It is high devastation to use FIRs only for a crossover ...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Raimonds Skuruls, post: 207326, member: 9926"] Hi Mark, Thank you for your thoughts! I am advocating the use of less ringing (less group delay) minimum phase filters as LR24 for example. They are taking just half of taps as necessary for linear phase filters. Then you can add time correction filter to make that crossover linear phase if you like. It takes just12 ms (and respective number of taps) as in previous example. You can have on hand two presets – one with zero latency by with some group delay, another - with linear phase (flat group delay) but with some few ms of latency. When we are using linear phase filters we are hoping that ringing of one filter will be compensated by ringing of other filter next to it – ringings are out of phase. It is very utopia hope. As you now, we can use two loudspeakers out of phase but will never get complete compensation of sounds of each other. Especial, in case when loudspeakers have different construction. We need to use a correction to make they transfer as identical as possible to go close to that task as possible. But, if we can use a correction, we do not need to use steep (ringing) filters and the risk of audibility of filter ringing is much less. All APL solutions (units, plugin) are supporting WAV format FIRs to be uploaded to them. It is high devastation to use FIRs only for a crossover ... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
FIR filters
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!