Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
First post for me
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bennett Prescott" data-source="post: 42050" data-attributes="member: 4"><p>Re: First post for me</p><p></p><p>Timo,</p><p></p><p>I have a few thoughts on the rest of your and Rasmus' questions but posting is being weird and I have a few other things to get done before I can commit to a long response.</p><p></p><p>I just wanted to say that end-fire doesn't change its response... on axis. Off axis, even 30 degrees off axis, it changes its response a lot! I like end fire for the amount of "impact" it maintains, but cardioid is much more consistent and high frequency combing is not as bad as simulations show largely due to simulations ignorance of box size, acoustical impedance, and room reflections. I agree Cardioid doesn't sound as punchy but for a lot of things that doesn't matter (corporate, dubstep, reggae...) and consistency of pattern and small deployment size is a much bigger deal.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bennett Prescott, post: 42050, member: 4"] Re: First post for me Timo, I have a few thoughts on the rest of your and Rasmus' questions but posting is being weird and I have a few other things to get done before I can commit to a long response. I just wanted to say that end-fire doesn't change its response... on axis. Off axis, even 30 degrees off axis, it changes its response a lot! I like end fire for the amount of "impact" it maintains, but cardioid is much more consistent and high frequency combing is not as bad as simulations show largely due to simulations ignorance of box size, acoustical impedance, and room reflections. I agree Cardioid doesn't sound as punchy but for a lot of things that doesn't matter (corporate, dubstep, reggae...) and consistency of pattern and small deployment size is a much bigger deal. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
First post for me
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!
