Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Eric Simna" data-source="post: 122557" data-attributes="member: 151">Re: Flown Sidefill OptionsThanks for the input everyone.&nbsp; The current boxes are fine output wise.&nbsp; I&#039;m not a fan of their response.&nbsp; The issue is the physical size.&nbsp; It&#039;s not really an issue for me.&nbsp; I&#039;m careful when flying soft goods. Others not so much.&nbsp; The boss just asked me to look for options.&nbsp; If I had my way we&#039;d put our Sx200s on stands in the wings when needed.&nbsp; The bosses disagree.Bumpers aren&#039;t the solution.&nbsp; The cabs are currently rigged about 3 feet off the batten, and bumpers works better with hard goods. And yes, Rob, things are very tight.&nbsp; Line sets that were originally dedicated to be electrics were given 12&quot; of spacing.&nbsp; Everything else is cozy. The work lights on that batten are about 8&quot; wide.&nbsp; Thanks for the EV suggestion Robert.&nbsp; I&#039;ll look more into those.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Eric Simna, post: 122557, member: 151"] Re: Flown Sidefill Options Thanks for the input everyone. The current boxes are fine output wise. I'm not a fan of their response. The issue is the physical size. It's not really an issue for me. I'm careful when flying soft goods. Others not so much. The boss just asked me to look for options. If I had my way we'd put our Sx200s on stands in the wings when needed. The bosses disagree. Bumpers aren't the solution. The cabs are currently rigged about 3 feet off the batten, and bumpers works better with hard goods. And yes, Rob, things are very tight. Line sets that were originally dedicated to be electrics were given 12" of spacing. Everything else is cozy. The work lights on that batten are about 8" wide. Thanks for the EV suggestion Robert. I'll look more into those. [/QUOTE]

Verification