Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
Frequency Response/Contour EQ in full range systems.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Phil Graham" data-source="post: 35505" data-attributes="member: 430"><p>Re: Frequency Response/Contour EQ in full range systems.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Right.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Its been a while since I've used SMAART 5, but this order also seems right. Regardless of you get there, it still serves the same purpose, at least as long as you want to include the direct response in the window. I have not yet played with the IR enough in SMAART 7 to know if you can apply a secondary window to the IR away from the direct arrival. You can apply a window at any point along the IR in Systune, so if I have had the need to do that, I have used Systune.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Not sure what you mean about skeptical of the "claimed benefits." Windowing is at the core of using the FT kernel function for real signals.</p><p></p><p>At any rate, in real world equalization circumstance, I find that the direct response matters most for perception at high frequencies, especially in pro audio, and in the lower frequencies, where the array Q is substantially lower, a good sounding tuning also considers the magnitude of the power response of the array.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Phil Graham, post: 35505, member: 430"] Re: Frequency Response/Contour EQ in full range systems. Right. Its been a while since I've used SMAART 5, but this order also seems right. Regardless of you get there, it still serves the same purpose, at least as long as you want to include the direct response in the window. I have not yet played with the IR enough in SMAART 7 to know if you can apply a secondary window to the IR away from the direct arrival. You can apply a window at any point along the IR in Systune, so if I have had the need to do that, I have used Systune. Not sure what you mean about skeptical of the "claimed benefits." Windowing is at the core of using the FT kernel function for real signals. At any rate, in real world equalization circumstance, I find that the direct response matters most for perception at high frequencies, especially in pro audio, and in the lower frequencies, where the array Q is substantially lower, a good sounding tuning also considers the magnitude of the power response of the array. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
Frequency Response/Contour EQ in full range systems.
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!