Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
GLD80 Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chris Nixon" data-source="post: 98004" data-attributes="member: 1947"><p>Re: GLD80 Discussion</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>GLD112.</p><p></p><p>Does exactly the same thing but you get another bank 8 of faders to play with.</p><p></p><p>There's a forum for the GLD here.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://iliveforum.allen-heath.com/forum.asp?FORUM_ID=8" target="_blank">iLive Forums - GLD Discussions</a></p><p></p><p>The main advantage over the LS9 would be the LCD scribble strips, the DCA's and the touchscreen.</p><p></p><p>The only drawbacks I can really think of would be that other than the FX rack all the processing is pre assigned. Eg. every bus has a GEQ on it, but it's integrated into the bus processing so you can't take that GEQ off the bus and put it on an input (if you wanted to).</p><p></p><p>You get 20 "mix outs" and 32 "mix buses". A "mix out" is an aux, a matrix, a subgroup or a main mix (eg. LR). A "mix bus" is the same with the addition of FX sends. </p><p></p><p>You can choose how many of each type of mix you want but you want, but mono mixes have to be allocated in pairs. </p><p></p><p>I use it set up with 6 mono auxes, 3 stereo groups, 2 mono matricies, 1 stereo matrix, Main LR and 2 unused mixes.</p><p></p><p>If I wanted to do monitors on it I could set it up to do 8 mono auxes and 6 stereo auxes.</p><p></p><p>This would use up 20 "mix outs" and leave 12 "mix buses" remaining for FX sends. You could do more FX send buses if you used less mix outs.</p><p></p><p>It uses a digital snake by design, so you don't have to re-buy all your preamps and converters to achieve this.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Chris</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chris Nixon, post: 98004, member: 1947"] Re: GLD80 Discussion GLD112. Does exactly the same thing but you get another bank 8 of faders to play with. There's a forum for the GLD here. [URL="http://iliveforum.allen-heath.com/forum.asp?FORUM_ID=8"]iLive Forums - GLD Discussions[/URL] The main advantage over the LS9 would be the LCD scribble strips, the DCA's and the touchscreen. The only drawbacks I can really think of would be that other than the FX rack all the processing is pre assigned. Eg. every bus has a GEQ on it, but it's integrated into the bus processing so you can't take that GEQ off the bus and put it on an input (if you wanted to). You get 20 "mix outs" and 32 "mix buses". A "mix out" is an aux, a matrix, a subgroup or a main mix (eg. LR). A "mix bus" is the same with the addition of FX sends. You can choose how many of each type of mix you want but you want, but mono mixes have to be allocated in pairs. I use it set up with 6 mono auxes, 3 stereo groups, 2 mono matricies, 1 stereo matrix, Main LR and 2 unused mixes. If I wanted to do monitors on it I could set it up to do 8 mono auxes and 6 stereo auxes. This would use up 20 "mix outs" and leave 12 "mix buses" remaining for FX sends. You could do more FX send buses if you used less mix outs. It uses a digital snake by design, so you don't have to re-buy all your preamps and converters to achieve this. Chris [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
GLD80 Discussion
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!