Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
GLD80 Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Caleb Dueck" data-source="post: 98116" data-attributes="member: 60"><p>Re: GLD80 Discussion</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is likely why they have one 8ch rack connect to the 'main' rack for drum sub-snake, and the other 8ch connect directly to the surface, for those with wireless at FOH rather than in the remote rack. We're quoting a GLD set up this way - main stage rack for stage inputs, 8ch for drum subsnake, and other 8ch for wireless rack. Between remote monitoring capability for wireless, and Dante, there just isn't much need anymore for local IO on the surface.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Caleb Dueck, post: 98116, member: 60"] Re: GLD80 Discussion This is likely why they have one 8ch rack connect to the 'main' rack for drum sub-snake, and the other 8ch connect directly to the surface, for those with wireless at FOH rather than in the remote rack. We're quoting a GLD set up this way - main stage rack for stage inputs, 8ch for drum subsnake, and other 8ch for wireless rack. Between remote monitoring capability for wireless, and Dante, there just isn't much need anymore for local IO on the surface. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
GLD80 Discussion
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!
