Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Jeff Babcock" data-source="post: 84608" data-attributes="member: 46">Re: Good DSPs for Home-Cooked Coefficients?Frank,Some that I am aware of, many of which have already come up:Biamp TesiraCrown iTech HDMediamatrix NionMiniDSP OpenDRCPowersoft KSoundweb LondonSymetrix Jupiter and Symnet EdgeAFAIK, the Xilica box implements FIR differently, I don&#039;t recall the specifics, but folks like Fulcrum apparently can&#039;t use them.Same deal with Lab Gruppen/Lake - FIR is implemented differently.&nbsp; However, I recall seeing some information that they were working on adding support for arbitrary coefficients, not sure where that is at though.&nbsp; Last I had heard they were aiming for late 2011, so not sure if that has stalled, been abandoned, or what.As you are likely already aware, in the interest of latency, you want to minimize the number of taps as much as possible, and be aware of the time vs frequency relationship.What is your intended application?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Jeff Babcock, post: 84608, member: 46"] Re: Good DSPs for Home-Cooked Coefficients? Frank, Some that I am aware of, many of which have already come up: Biamp Tesira Crown iTech HD Mediamatrix Nion MiniDSP OpenDRC Powersoft K Soundweb London Symetrix Jupiter and Symnet Edge AFAIK, the Xilica box implements FIR differently, I don't recall the specifics, but folks like Fulcrum apparently can't use them. Same deal with Lab Gruppen/Lake - FIR is implemented differently. However, I recall seeing some information that they were working on adding support for arbitrary coefficients, not sure where that is at though. Last I had heard they were aiming for late 2011, so not sure if that has stalled, been abandoned, or what. As you are likely already aware, in the interest of latency, you want to minimize the number of taps as much as possible, and be aware of the time vs frequency relationship. What is your intended application? [/QUOTE]

Verification