Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Frank Koenig" data-source="post: 84619" data-attributes="member: 416">Re: Good DSPs for Home-Cooked Coefficients?Jeff,Thanks for that list and the heads up on the Xilica and&nbsp; Lab/Lake. I still have to make up my mind between a free-standing&nbsp; processor and processed amps. There are multiple requirements I&#039;m trying&nbsp; to satisfy. I downloaded Powersoft&#039;s Armonia control application. It&nbsp; looks like what I want is in there and, while a bit bloated, it&#039;s much&nbsp; more to my liking than the Lab/Lake app, which makes me crazy.My&nbsp; application is to try my hand at coming up with a set of tools to clean&nbsp; up some of the linear time and spatially invariant aberrations of&nbsp; speakers in the HF range. I have a background in signal processing&nbsp; so have some idea of what may be involved. I&#039;ve been simulating some&nbsp; things in R, which appears to be a pretty nice environment for this sort&nbsp; of work even though it&#039;s really for statisticians.--Frank</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Frank Koenig, post: 84619, member: 416"] Re: Good DSPs for Home-Cooked Coefficients? Jeff, Thanks for that list and the heads up on the Xilica and Lab/Lake. I still have to make up my mind between a free-standing processor and processed amps. There are multiple requirements I'm trying to satisfy. I downloaded Powersoft's Armonia control application. It looks like what I want is in there and, while a bit bloated, it's much more to my liking than the Lab/Lake app, which makes me crazy. My application is to try my hand at coming up with a set of tools to clean up some of the linear time and spatially invariant aberrations of speakers in the HF range. I have a background in signal processing so have some idea of what may be involved. I've been simulating some things in R, which appears to be a pretty nice environment for this sort of work even though it's really for statisticians. --Frank [/QUOTE]

Verification