Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="John Roberts" data-source="post: 68167" data-attributes="member: 126">Re: Growler and other subsMy last patent (already a few years ago) seemed to issue quicker than previous patents, but I don&#039;t know what your frame of reference is. I have been active in the patent system over a few decades. If anything my complaint is that the patent examination is not very rigorous, and they leave it to the courts to parse out the details. Winning a patent buys you the right to sue, not a slam dunk in a field of activity where there could be some obscure prior art sitting around that &quot;resembles&quot; technology advances. The patent system doesn&#039;t depend on people understanding how inventions work, if they did TD would have a huge advantage.&nbsp;&nbsp; I am a Danley fan boy so wish you much success. Making speakers that kick ass seems like a good business strategy. IP protection would be icing on that cake. Good luck.&nbsp;&nbsp; JR</blockquote>

[QUOTE="John Roberts, post: 68167, member: 126"] Re: Growler and other subs My last patent (already a few years ago) seemed to issue quicker than previous patents, but I don't know what your frame of reference is. I have been active in the patent system over a few decades. If anything my complaint is that the patent examination is not very rigorous, and they leave it to the courts to parse out the details. Winning a patent buys you the right to sue, not a slam dunk in a field of activity where there could be some obscure prior art sitting around that "resembles" technology advances. The patent system doesn't depend on people understanding how inventions work, if they did TD would have a huge advantage. I am a Danley fan boy so wish you much success. Making speakers that kick ass seems like a good business strategy. IP protection would be icing on that cake. Good luck. JR [/QUOTE]

Verification