Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="John Roberts" data-source="post: 74694" data-attributes="member: 126">Re: Grumpy guy observation about the X32 threadFor the record I don&#039;t think Behringer has presented the X-32 as anything other than a feature rich low priced digital console (that hopefully doesn&#039;t suck). IMO it is over the top customers rationalizing their purchase decision (and perhaps a few dealers) inclined to compare these to high end offerings (one even comparing it to a Ferrari... seriously?). There is a superficial resemblance to more expensive consoles with similar features, while there are visible constraints (like sample rates supported for one obvious example), engineered in, to maintain differentiation between Behringer and their more expensive Midas offerings. Even I can&#039;t predict the future <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":-)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :-)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":-)" />&nbsp; so this offering deserves being approached cautiously for conservative applications as would any new product of this complexity from anybody. Many of us have hardened opinions about the brand. Isn&#039;t that pretty much what triggered this thread? I don&#039;t expect other people to think exactly like me, because they haven&#039;t shared my life experience. YMMVJR</blockquote>

[QUOTE="John Roberts, post: 74694, member: 126"] Re: Grumpy guy observation about the X32 thread For the record I don't think Behringer has presented the X-32 as anything other than a feature rich low priced digital console (that hopefully doesn't suck). IMO it is over the top customers rationalizing their purchase decision (and perhaps a few dealers) inclined to compare these to high end offerings (one even comparing it to a Ferrari... seriously?). There is a superficial resemblance to more expensive consoles with similar features, while there are visible constraints (like sample rates supported for one obvious example), engineered in, to maintain differentiation between Behringer and their more expensive Midas offerings. Even I can't predict the future :-) so this offering deserves being approached cautiously for conservative applications as would any new product of this complexity from anybody. Many of us have hardened opinions about the brand. Isn't that pretty much what triggered this thread? I don't expect other people to think exactly like me, because they haven't shared my life experience. YMMV JR [/QUOTE]

Verification