Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Per SÃ¸vik" data-source="post: 75129" data-attributes="member: 1285">Re: Grumpy guy observation about the X32 threadIt is easy to forget that this is not Behringer&#039;s first digital mixer. Either the market or Behringer or both weren&#039;t quite ready when the ddx3216 came out a decade ago, but it is not hard to imagine that the process leading to the X32 have been going on inside Behringer during the last decade both in terms of developing the original concept and also developing their digital prowess with the other digital products that have been around for a while.I guess this is typical in a lot of markets, that the early high price manufacturers keep doing their thing while the mass-market manufacturers slowly catch up as the technology advances to the point where further advancement becomes rather pointless, at which point the cheap stuff catches up rather quickly. If 1000 megapixel cameras had been relevant, Kodak would probably still be in there with the pro cameras, and if 768 kHz was relevant for sound we would still be a few years away from viable low cost competitors.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Per SÃ¸vik, post: 75129, member: 1285"] Re: Grumpy guy observation about the X32 thread It is easy to forget that this is not Behringer's first digital mixer. Either the market or Behringer or both weren't quite ready when the ddx3216 came out a decade ago, but it is not hard to imagine that the process leading to the X32 have been going on inside Behringer during the last decade both in terms of developing the original concept and also developing their digital prowess with the other digital products that have been around for a while. I guess this is typical in a lot of markets, that the early high price manufacturers keep doing their thing while the mass-market manufacturers slowly catch up as the technology advances to the point where further advancement becomes rather pointless, at which point the cheap stuff catches up rather quickly. If 1000 megapixel cameras had been relevant, Kodak would probably still be in there with the pro cameras, and if 768 kHz was relevant for sound we would still be a few years away from viable low cost competitors. [/QUOTE]

Verification