Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Evan Kirkendall" data-source="post: 40111" data-attributes="member: 5">Re: Here&#039;s the picture you ALL have been waiting forOut of band EQ has changed my world, and method of setting up x-overs. My method for determining where the out of band EQ is needed goes something like this:1. I measure the output of my DSP with the HP/LF engaged, and save the trace in smaart. 2. Then I apply the filter to the speaker and measure the response with the HP/LP.3. I&#039;ll then use a few key EQ cuts to make the acoustic slope of the speaker match the electrical slope of the DSP more closely. Normally it only takes one or 2 very narrow, and very steep cuts to make it work. The most noticeable difference for me was adding out of band EQ to the HPF on subs. You can easily smooth out nasty peaks in the response of subs in their upper band while still using a much shallower HPF. Evan</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Evan Kirkendall, post: 40111, member: 5"] Re: Here's the picture you ALL have been waiting for Out of band EQ has changed my world, and method of setting up x-overs. My method for determining where the out of band EQ is needed goes something like this: 1. I measure the output of my DSP with the HP/LF engaged, and save the trace in smaart. 2. Then I apply the filter to the speaker and measure the response with the HP/LP. 3. I'll then use a few key EQ cuts to make the acoustic slope of the speaker match the electrical slope of the DSP more closely. Normally it only takes one or 2 very narrow, and very steep cuts to make it work. The most noticeable difference for me was adding out of band EQ to the HPF on subs. You can easily smooth out nasty peaks in the response of subs in their upper band while still using a much shallower HPF. Evan [/QUOTE]

Verification