Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Helge A. Bentsen" data-source="post: 55582" data-attributes="member: 263">Re: High output main speakers.A quick look at spec sheets tell me that I can expect around 10 dB more from an SH-46 from roughly the same footprint. That is an advantage. Is the SH-46 also a passive box? Then I can reuse my amp racks and cabling <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />I like the KF850z, but it&#039;s bigger, 3-way active and doesn&#039;t sound as good as the SH-50. It definetly among the top contenders in the point-source world, but the sound of the Qx speakers is a bit better IMHO, so that is my EAW option for now. It&#039;s not as easy to use in a stacking application though.Has anybody tried using SH-46 and SH-50s in the same array? I&#039;ve done that with flown 850s and used 650 flown below for mid/near throw applications. Would a setup like this work with the Danleys?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Helge A. Bentsen, post: 55582, member: 263"] Re: High output main speakers. A quick look at spec sheets tell me that I can expect around 10 dB more from an SH-46 from roughly the same footprint. That is an advantage. Is the SH-46 also a passive box? Then I can reuse my amp racks and cabling :) I like the KF850z, but it's bigger, 3-way active and doesn't sound as good as the SH-50. It definetly among the top contenders in the point-source world, but the sound of the Qx speakers is a bit better IMHO, so that is my EAW option for now. It's not as easy to use in a stacking application though. Has anybody tried using SH-46 and SH-50s in the same array? I've done that with flown 850s and used 650 flown below for mid/near throw applications. Would a setup like this work with the Danleys? [/QUOTE]

Verification