Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
HyperboLine ™ new Player in the Old Game
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="drew gandy" data-source="post: 107907" data-attributes="member: 880"><p>Re: HyperboLine ™ new Player in the Old Game</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It is my understanding (and I could be wrong about this) that the telephone bandwidth was determined long before any digital stuff got put into use and was the result of speech intelligibility research. <em>I think</em> that 8khz sampling was chosen to support the already established spectrum. </p><p></p><p>btw, your 4.5db attenuation appears to me to be a better case example. For instance, at 85 deg F temp and 20% humidity the absorption is almost 13db. I'm not sure how often it gets that dry at 85 but even at 50% humidity at 85 deg it's over 10db of attenuation. The calculator that Art linked to in the first post is pretty cool and shows that the air absorption is a pretty strong variable. It seems to make sense to tilt the response towards the top end for outdoor and long throw applications as compared to the telephone receiver where the sound travels mere millimeters.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="drew gandy, post: 107907, member: 880"] Re: HyperboLine ™ new Player in the Old Game It is my understanding (and I could be wrong about this) that the telephone bandwidth was determined long before any digital stuff got put into use and was the result of speech intelligibility research. [I]I think[/I] that 8khz sampling was chosen to support the already established spectrum. btw, your 4.5db attenuation appears to me to be a better case example. For instance, at 85 deg F temp and 20% humidity the absorption is almost 13db. I'm not sure how often it gets that dry at 85 but even at 50% humidity at 85 deg it's over 10db of attenuation. The calculator that Art linked to in the first post is pretty cool and shows that the air absorption is a pretty strong variable. It seems to make sense to tilt the response towards the top end for outdoor and long throw applications as compared to the telephone receiver where the sound travels mere millimeters. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
HyperboLine ™ new Player in the Old Game
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!