Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Arthur Skudra" data-source="post: 24456" data-attributes="member: 131">Re: Inexpensive Measurement micI have six RTA-420&#039;s, along with my trusty Earthworks M30.&nbsp; Two of the RTA 420&#039;s compare rather favourably with the M30, the other 420&#039;s have about 2-3 dB of variance between them primarily in the frequency range above 8K, but otherwise they are for the most part flat in the frequency range of interest for most sound reinforcement system optimization.&nbsp; If you&#039;re doing high end studio monitors, well that&#039;s another story...If you&#039;re using Smaart 7, then I highly recommend any mic purchases be made *with* a calibration file for an upcoming new &quot;feature.&quot; Oooops, did I say that???&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />&nbsp; &nbsp; The set of four Audix TM-1&#039;s with a usb key of data is a rather good value.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Arthur Skudra, post: 24456, member: 131"] Re: Inexpensive Measurement mic I have six RTA-420's, along with my trusty Earthworks M30. Two of the RTA 420's compare rather favourably with the M30, the other 420's have about 2-3 dB of variance between them primarily in the frequency range above 8K, but otherwise they are for the most part flat in the frequency range of interest for most sound reinforcement system optimization. If you're doing high end studio monitors, well that's another story... If you're using Smaart 7, then I highly recommend any mic purchases be made *with* a calibration file for an upcoming new "feature." Oooops, did I say that??? ;) The set of four Audix TM-1's with a usb key of data is a rather good value. [/QUOTE]

Verification