Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="John Roberts" data-source="post: 141538" data-attributes="member: 126">Re: Infocomm???I am already a fan boy so don&#039;t need convincing but that is pretty damn impressive.&nbsp; Are both of those videos shot with the same recorder? I can hear some deterioration in the second video but being able to recognize the song from over a 1/4 mile away is an achievement. For it to sound that coherent is remarkable. Since the sound quality was slowly varying I expect it was atmospheric effects over that distance air path and not the recorder. I think I heard some &quot;cheap mic&quot; effect in the second recording too, or perhaps a cheap AGC dealing with lower SPL ( As i listen over cheap computer speakers :-( ) .&nbsp; Congrats to all involved JRPS:&nbsp; Not sure neighbors 1/4 mile away want to hear the music, but at least they can understand the words, and sing along. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":-)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :-)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":-)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="John Roberts, post: 141538, member: 126"] Re: Infocomm??? I am already a fan boy so don't need convincing but that is pretty damn impressive. Are both of those videos shot with the same recorder? I can hear some deterioration in the second video but being able to recognize the song from over a 1/4 mile away is an achievement. For it to sound that coherent is remarkable. Since the sound quality was slowly varying I expect it was atmospheric effects over that distance air path and not the recorder. I think I heard some "cheap mic" effect in the second recording too, or perhaps a cheap AGC dealing with lower SPL ( As i listen over cheap computer speakers :-( ) . Congrats to all involved JR PS: Not sure neighbors 1/4 mile away want to hear the music, but at least they can understand the words, and sing along. :-) [/QUOTE]

Verification