Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Jack Arnott" data-source="post: 142015" data-attributes="member: 304">Re: Infocomm???First off, let me say that I in no way endorse line arrays over point source. I have no problems with any of your arguments about speaker design. I am on your side. I have no problems with any of your facts. I love the DIY point source project that is going on here. I love even small things that are point source, like 5&quot; coaxial speakers in a tiny box, that sound like a wall, instead of a point. I love Danley products. I do point source myself, in my own small way. I am a point source man. I was in fact re-reading the thread, because I wanted to reference something that Tom had written, as it came up in a conversation I had earlier in the day, and wanted to clarify in my mind what he had written. (Factual)What struck me funny (not odd funny, but ha ha funny)(I was giggling) was your logic, and presentation. TO ME it read that loudspeaker driver manufacturers are somehow driving the market. Part of some kind of problem, or conspiracy. Instead of simply supplying a demand. (This is where your &quot;factual&quot; broke down.) &quot;But the loudspeaker driver manufacturers DO NOT want this to happen. They are LOVING being able to sell more drivers to do the same job as fewer drivers.&quot;Kind of like XKCD #925, that concludes that cancer causes cell phones. Sorry to drag you in Bennett, but to me, you are THE speaker component man, in North America, and I saw it as a poke at you. Striking my funny bone for a second time. As you are one of the people who bring us this wonderful place, to exchange factual ideas. I probably did not convey this very well. I broke my rule (self imposed over a decade ago) (often broken) about not posting in August, when the heat has melted my brain. August, the most grumpy of months, (empirical, not factual), as observed by me. Also over a decade ago.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Jack Arnott, post: 142015, member: 304"] Re: Infocomm??? First off, let me say that I in no way endorse line arrays over point source. I have no problems with any of your arguments about speaker design. I am on your side. I have no problems with any of your facts. I love the DIY point source project that is going on here. I love even small things that are point source, like 5" coaxial speakers in a tiny box, that sound like a wall, instead of a point. I love Danley products. I do point source myself, in my own small way. I am a point source man. I was in fact re-reading the thread, because I wanted to reference something that Tom had written, as it came up in a conversation I had earlier in the day, and wanted to clarify in my mind what he had written. (Factual) What struck me funny (not odd funny, but ha ha funny)(I was giggling) was your logic, and presentation. TO ME it read that loudspeaker driver manufacturers are somehow driving the market. Part of some kind of problem, or conspiracy. Instead of simply supplying a demand. (This is where your "factual" broke down.) "But the loudspeaker driver manufacturers DO NOT want this to happen. They are LOVING being able to sell more drivers to do the same job as fewer drivers." Kind of like XKCD #925, that concludes that cancer causes cell phones. Sorry to drag you in Bennett, but to me, you are THE speaker component man, in North America, and I saw it as a poke at you. Striking my funny bone for a second time. As you are one of the people who bring us this wonderful place, to exchange factual ideas. I probably did not convey this very well. I broke my rule (self imposed over a decade ago) (often broken) about not posting in August, when the heat has melted my brain. August, the most grumpy of months, (empirical, not factual), as observed by me. Also over a decade ago. [/QUOTE]

Verification