Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="TJ Cornish" data-source="post: 57978" data-attributes="member: 162">Re: Intermod distortion 2-way vs 3-wayOne other question on the T12.&nbsp; In the software, virtually any configuration I put into the system leaves the array flat, except for possibly the last box, which is either tilted down all the way, or is flat like the rest of the array.&nbsp; Is this a limitation of the software, or is it really best to run the T12s flat?&nbsp; I&#039;ve spent a number of hours in various other calculators I&#039;ve played with, and in all cases, coverage is improved with splaying.Also, the software indicates pretty incredible pattern control for the T12s all the way down to 125Hz for a 5 box hang.&nbsp; This seems improbable.&nbsp; Playing with 4887s in the JBL calc which are approximately the same height give a lot more off axis lobing, and it takes like 18 boxes of 4889 to make the graph look like the T12 plot.&nbsp; Is it magic, or crappy software?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="TJ Cornish, post: 57978, member: 162"] Re: Intermod distortion 2-way vs 3-way One other question on the T12. In the software, virtually any configuration I put into the system leaves the array flat, except for possibly the last box, which is either tilted down all the way, or is flat like the rest of the array. Is this a limitation of the software, or is it really best to run the T12s flat? I've spent a number of hours in various other calculators I've played with, and in all cases, coverage is improved with splaying. Also, the software indicates pretty incredible pattern control for the T12s all the way down to 125Hz for a 5 box hang. This seems improbable. Playing with 4887s in the JBL calc which are approximately the same height give a lot more off axis lobing, and it takes like 18 boxes of 4889 to make the graph look like the T12 plot. Is it magic, or crappy software? [/QUOTE]

Verification