Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ned Ward" data-source="post: 15865" data-attributes="member: 100">Re: iPhone 4 is on Verizon!!!Jeff - thanks for that information - interesting stuff. I&#039;ve also read that in high congestion city areas where ATT&#039;s 3G isn&#039;t optimum, they&#039;re experimenting with supplementing it with WiFi, which would have a much bigger pipe; Times Square is one of the areas they&#039;re looking at. Again, this doesn&#039;t help in lower density rural areas, but I like the fact that they&#039;re looking at it from different ways to solve.I&#039;m still also interested to see how well someone else&#039;s network &#039;&#039;works&#039;&#039; when it gets an influx that big of data-hungry users. Hopefully Verizon users will fare better than ATT, but when you may get 15 million iphones activated per year (last year&#039;s ATT activation count) it does throw calculations out the window.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ned Ward, post: 15865, member: 100"] Re: iPhone 4 is on Verizon!!! Jeff - thanks for that information - interesting stuff. I've also read that in high congestion city areas where ATT's 3G isn't optimum, they're experimenting with supplementing it with WiFi, which would have a much bigger pipe; Times Square is one of the areas they're looking at. Again, this doesn't help in lower density rural areas, but I like the fact that they're looking at it from different ways to solve. I'm still also interested to see how well someone else's network ''works'' when it gets an influx that big of data-hungry users. Hopefully Verizon users will fare better than ATT, but when you may get 15 million iphones activated per year (last year's ATT activation count) it does throw calculations out the window. [/QUOTE]

Verification