Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ivan Beaver" data-source="post: 80096" data-attributes="member: 30">Re: Just got back from MacWorld and...The big misunderstanding about combfiltering is that most people think that it is real obvious and real nasty sounding.It is not-and can EASILY fool experienced sound guys.&nbsp; I once spent quite awhile chasing down the combfiltering inside a digital console-but I did not realize it as such-until I measured the impulse response-THEN it was very obvious.It is just that WITHOUT the combfiltering it sounds better-clearer etc.&nbsp; So most people don&#039;t even know they are experiencing it-so they say it doesn&#039;t exist or is a problem.&nbsp; But it could be better.&nbsp; Getting the job done-and getting it done correctly are often different things.Agreed I would have turned off one speaker on each side-or at least turn the level down quite a bit-so that it was still making noise-but not enough to cause interference.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ivan Beaver, post: 80096, member: 30"] Re: Just got back from MacWorld and... The big misunderstanding about combfiltering is that most people think that it is real obvious and real nasty sounding. It is not-and can EASILY fool experienced sound guys. I once spent quite awhile chasing down the combfiltering inside a digital console-but I did not realize it as such-until I measured the impulse response-THEN it was very obvious. It is just that WITHOUT the combfiltering it sounds better-clearer etc. So most people don't even know they are experiencing it-so they say it doesn't exist or is a problem. But it could be better. Getting the job done-and getting it done correctly are often different things. Agreed I would have turned off one speaker on each side-or at least turn the level down quite a bit-so that it was still making noise-but not enough to cause interference. [/QUOTE]

Verification