Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Product Reviews
Lectrosonics Quadra Digital IEM Review
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Langston Holland" data-source="post: 33440" data-attributes="member: 171"><p>Re: Lectrosonics Quadra Digital IEM Review</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Be very careful with that kind of thing. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> I've been communicating with the designer of the Benchmark products recently and he remeasured the DAC1-ADC1 latency and found their specs to be off a small amount: "+/- 0.1ms". They based their published specs on the OEM provided specs of the individual parts used in the units.</p><p></p><p>It was enough to bug him, but is immaterial in this review and it still means my FFT based latency measurements may be too high. Maybe. I'm getting my dual channel scope out to figure out what the stink is going on here. CLIO, Smaart, ARTA, SysTune, EASERA Pro and MLSSA agree with one another in the time domain in my experience - so this is quite the mystery - or maybe digital stuff like this simply exhibits tolerance variations on this scale.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Langston Holland, post: 33440, member: 171"] Re: Lectrosonics Quadra Digital IEM Review Be very careful with that kind of thing. :) I've been communicating with the designer of the Benchmark products recently and he remeasured the DAC1-ADC1 latency and found their specs to be off a small amount: "+/- 0.1ms". They based their published specs on the OEM provided specs of the individual parts used in the units. It was enough to bug him, but is immaterial in this review and it still means my FFT based latency measurements may be too high. Maybe. I'm getting my dual channel scope out to figure out what the stink is going on here. CLIO, Smaart, ARTA, SysTune, EASERA Pro and MLSSA agree with one another in the time domain in my experience - so this is quite the mystery - or maybe digital stuff like this simply exhibits tolerance variations on this scale. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Product Reviews
Lectrosonics Quadra Digital IEM Review
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!
