Normal
Re: Lectrosonics Quadra Digital IEM ReviewBe very careful with that kind of thing. I've been communicating with the designer of the Benchmark products recently and he remeasured the DAC1-ADC1 latency and found their specs to be off a small amount: "+/- 0.1ms". They based their published specs on the OEM provided specs of the individual parts used in the units.It was enough to bug him, but is immaterial in this review and it still means my FFT based latency measurements may be too high. Maybe. I'm getting my dual channel scope out to figure out what the stink is going on here. CLIO, Smaart, ARTA, SysTune, EASERA Pro and MLSSA agree with one another in the time domain in my experience - so this is quite the mystery - or maybe digital stuff like this simply exhibits tolerance variations on this scale.
Re: Lectrosonics Quadra Digital IEM Review
Be very careful with that kind of thing. I've been communicating with the designer of the Benchmark products recently and he remeasured the DAC1-ADC1 latency and found their specs to be off a small amount: "+/- 0.1ms". They based their published specs on the OEM provided specs of the individual parts used in the units.
It was enough to bug him, but is immaterial in this review and it still means my FFT based latency measurements may be too high. Maybe. I'm getting my dual channel scope out to figure out what the stink is going on here. CLIO, Smaart, ARTA, SysTune, EASERA Pro and MLSSA agree with one another in the time domain in my experience - so this is quite the mystery - or maybe digital stuff like this simply exhibits tolerance variations on this scale.
