Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Langston Holland" data-source="post: 33449" data-attributes="member: 171">Re: Lectrosonics Quadra Digital IEM ReviewReasonable question TJ. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />The &quot;Edit 3&quot; point you quoted is the end of it. My goal was to soften the edge of the Line 6 dropout statement without avoiding the fact of the matter. The prototype explanation makes sense to me, time will tell. Even if the dropouts I experienced aren&#039;t improved by future design changes, the thing is a gift at its price point. If I lived with those units long enough I&#039;m pretty sure I could figure out how to reduce or more likely eliminate the dropouts - possibly at a reduced maximum channel count, or just getting the RF I/O a bit closer, or both.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Langston Holland, post: 33449, member: 171"] Re: Lectrosonics Quadra Digital IEM Review Reasonable question TJ. :) The "Edit 3" point you quoted is the end of it. My goal was to soften the edge of the Line 6 dropout statement without avoiding the fact of the matter. The prototype explanation makes sense to me, time will tell. Even if the dropouts I experienced aren't improved by future design changes, the thing is a gift at its price point. If I lived with those units long enough I'm pretty sure I could figure out how to reduce or more likely eliminate the dropouts - possibly at a reduced maximum channel count, or just getting the RF I/O a bit closer, or both. [/QUOTE]

Verification