Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="brian maddox" data-source="post: 68278" data-attributes="member: 158">Re: Limiting Within Line Arraysnot to mention it will flat out sound better.&nbsp; in most cases WAY better.&nbsp; IME, a quality rig that is loafing along has a &#039;sound&#039; to it that is hard to duplicate with anything that is being pushed hard, no matter how high-tech it may be.In fact, an outdated but oversized, quality rig will outperform a modern but under-sized PA every time.&nbsp; I think for most smaller operations, this is a fact that is overlooked in pursuit of having the &#039;latest and greatest&#039;.Obviously, things like rig size and parts availability and lots of other things factor into whether a smaller modern rig is the right tool for the job.&nbsp; But if i were a smaller operation, i&#039;d probably rather have a big ol&#039; pile of KF850s than a 3 or 4&nbsp; a side &#039;line array&#039;.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="brian maddox, post: 68278, member: 158"] Re: Limiting Within Line Arrays not to mention it will flat out sound better. in most cases WAY better. IME, a quality rig that is loafing along has a 'sound' to it that is hard to duplicate with anything that is being pushed hard, no matter how high-tech it may be. In fact, an outdated but oversized, quality rig will outperform a modern but under-sized PA every time. I think for most smaller operations, this is a fact that is overlooked in pursuit of having the 'latest and greatest'. Obviously, things like rig size and parts availability and lots of other things factor into whether a smaller modern rig is the right tool for the job. But if i were a smaller operation, i'd probably rather have a big ol' pile of KF850s than a 3 or 4 a side 'line array'. [/QUOTE]

Verification