Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Helge A. Bentsen" data-source="post: 125282" data-attributes="member: 263">Re: Line array calculators indoors - some observations and questionsI did a lot of these arrays last year, mostly groundstacked, some flown. This was my basic setup for four 4886 a side.248I aimed the mid-point between box 1 and 2 at the far seats, and used some frontfill. IME this sounded pretty good and gave a consistent sound.The JBL calc doesn&#039;t compute low buildup and HF loss correctly. Expect to loose more HF in the rear and a lot more below 200hz overall than the calc tells you indoors. But once you get familiar with it, you can archive some pretty decent results that translates well from the screen to the room <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Helge A. Bentsen, post: 125282, member: 263"] Re: Line array calculators indoors - some observations and questions I did a lot of these arrays last year, mostly groundstacked, some flown. This was my basic setup for four 4886 a side. 2 4 8 I aimed the mid-point between box 1 and 2 at the far seats, and used some frontfill. IME this sounded pretty good and gave a consistent sound. The JBL calc doesn't compute low buildup and HF loss correctly. Expect to loose more HF in the rear and a lot more below 200hz overall than the calc tells you indoors. But once you get familiar with it, you can archive some pretty decent results that translates well from the screen to the room :) [/QUOTE]

Verification