Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="frank kayser" data-source="post: 24489" data-attributes="member: 28">Re: Line level Isolationgot this note back from Whirlwind comparing their products:Hello from Whirlwind,The ISOXL does have a smaller transformer and its frequency response will not be as low as the larger TRSP600L used in the larger box type ISOs. The frequency response spec at 100 Hz, 0 dBu is -0.13 dBu. That&#039;s not bad as long as you don&#039;t drive it really hard.The spec on the TRSP600L @ is 20 - 20k Hz, +/- 0.57 dBu but at +20 dBu.So the ISOXL becomes a handy and relatively inexpensive problem solver. In fact, they&#039;re used all the time to isolate mixers from amplifiers in PA systems.The ISO1 uses the same TRSP600L transformer as the Line Balancer but only has the single channel of isolation without the splitting capability but it&#039;s a bit less expensive.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="frank kayser, post: 24489, member: 28"] Re: Line level Isolation got this note back from Whirlwind comparing their products: [I]Hello from Whirlwind, The ISOXL does have a smaller transformer and its frequency response will not be as low as the larger TRSP600L used in the larger box type ISOs. [B]The frequency response spec at 100 Hz, 0 dBu is -0.13 dBu.[/B] That's not bad as long as you don't drive it really hard. The spec on the TRSP600L @ is 20 - 20k Hz, +/- 0.57 dBu but at +20 dBu. So the ISOXL becomes a handy and relatively inexpensive problem solver. In fact, they're used all the time to isolate mixers from amplifiers in PA systems. The ISO1 uses the same TRSP600L transformer as the Line Balancer but only has the single channel of isolation without the splitting capability but it's a bit less expensive.[/I] [/QUOTE]

Verification