Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Local rental house phasing out VRXLA-P, phasing in QSC KLA...why?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Steve Milner" data-source="post: 91598" data-attributes="member: 9"><p>Re: Local rental house phasing out VRXLA-P, phasing in QSC KLA...why?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p> You're right Darren, but coming from a pretty fair amount of VRX experience, I tend to <em>only</em> want to fly them w/ a sub at the top of the array. With a pair of 932's & a 918 (per hang) flown as the main arrays and an aux fed cluster somewhere on the ground, I find the VRX to be far more useful then when you just fly the 932's and have all of your subs on the ground. </p><p></p><p> I've dry hired this configuration from two local (friends) who are providers, pretty often over the past few years, and think it's a pretty common package for mid-sized corporate work and similar applications where you would find this type of cabinet being deployed. Requiring a specific tool to go out w/ the boxes just seems like a misstep on an otherwise very well thought-out rigging system. </p><p></p><p>I'm sure that I'm over-thinking this, and honestly, I carry a hex key set in my kit typically... but for a rental fleet, it would just make me a bit nervous. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" />~:-(~:sad:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Steve Milner, post: 91598, member: 9"] Re: Local rental house phasing out VRXLA-P, phasing in QSC KLA...why? You're right Darren, but coming from a pretty fair amount of VRX experience, I tend to [I]only[/I] want to fly them w/ a sub at the top of the array. With a pair of 932's & a 918 (per hang) flown as the main arrays and an aux fed cluster somewhere on the ground, I find the VRX to be far more useful then when you just fly the 932's and have all of your subs on the ground. I've dry hired this configuration from two local (friends) who are providers, pretty often over the past few years, and think it's a pretty common package for mid-sized corporate work and similar applications where you would find this type of cabinet being deployed. Requiring a specific tool to go out w/ the boxes just seems like a misstep on an otherwise very well thought-out rigging system. I'm sure that I'm over-thinking this, and honestly, I carry a hex key set in my kit typically... but for a rental fleet, it would just make me a bit nervous. :(~:-(~:sad: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Local rental house phasing out VRXLA-P, phasing in QSC KLA...why?
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!