Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
LS9 - any workarounds for ganging up output mix control?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kip Conner" data-source="post: 57080" data-attributes="member: 445"><p>Re: LS9 - any workarounds for ganging up output mix control?</p><p></p><p>You can't send an aux to the mono buss but you can send it to the matrix. As long as the mixes were the same the matrix solution seems to be easiest. I'm afraid that everyone is correct in that you are going to need to compromise a good deal. </p><p></p><p>Is the idea that you want to have several outputs respond as the main fader is moved, but you need the mixes to be discreet? Would you be able to accomplish what you need if you set up the outputs on the Custom Fader Bank? This way you could flip over there and have access to all the masters for those out whether it be mix, master or matrix. </p><p></p><p>If it was on/off deal than the mute masters could be handy- but it sounds like you need to change the amplitude and want everything to go with single fader control. </p><p></p><p>You can send the mono to the matrix and then you could pick and choose what went to the mono->matrix (but you can't have specific levels)</p><p></p><p>I've always kept my subs, fills, delays on auxes but that is really me just slowing moving from the analog world. The matrix is the easy way to do it, but I still like to keep things out of the subs that have no business being there.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kip Conner, post: 57080, member: 445"] Re: LS9 - any workarounds for ganging up output mix control? You can't send an aux to the mono buss but you can send it to the matrix. As long as the mixes were the same the matrix solution seems to be easiest. I'm afraid that everyone is correct in that you are going to need to compromise a good deal. Is the idea that you want to have several outputs respond as the main fader is moved, but you need the mixes to be discreet? Would you be able to accomplish what you need if you set up the outputs on the Custom Fader Bank? This way you could flip over there and have access to all the masters for those out whether it be mix, master or matrix. If it was on/off deal than the mute masters could be handy- but it sounds like you need to change the amplitude and want everything to go with single fader control. You can send the mono to the matrix and then you could pick and choose what went to the mono->matrix (but you can't have specific levels) I've always kept my subs, fills, delays on auxes but that is really me just slowing moving from the analog world. The matrix is the easy way to do it, but I still like to keep things out of the subs that have no business being there. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
LS9 - any workarounds for ganging up output mix control?
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!