Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ales Dravinec" data-source="post: 43041" data-attributes="member: 11">Re: M1d array correctionHelge,Nine box M1D array is, in my opinion, still rather small sound system, dimension (length) wise.Array correction, if you meant low frequency buildup, is probably best handled for the whole array. This WILL provide the best result as well as remove a temptation to fiddle in this particular band pass.On the other hand, you may wish to apply some sort of HF shelf or other sort of HF boost EQ for units intended to cover further most seats.Those will probably be the top ones.Array correction on G616 will address the whole hang. You may chose a different box &#039;count&#039; when deciding about the setting. The decision will be partially influenced by type of act, hence available LF headroom as well as personal taste.Apart from respecting MS, I&#039;m not affiliated with them in any other particular way, so please take my thoughts as a general type of &#039;advice&#039;.With respect</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ales Dravinec, post: 43041, member: 11"] Re: M1d array correction Helge, Nine box M1D array is, in my opinion, still rather small sound system, dimension (length) wise. Array correction, if you meant low frequency buildup, is probably best handled for the whole array. This WILL provide the best result as well as remove a temptation to fiddle in this particular band pass. On the other hand, you may wish to apply some sort of HF shelf or other sort of HF boost EQ for units intended to cover further most seats. Those will probably be the top ones. Array correction on G616 will address the whole hang. You may chose a different box 'count' when deciding about the setting. The decision will be partially influenced by type of act, hence available LF headroom as well as personal taste. Apart from respecting MS, I'm not affiliated with them in any other particular way, so please take my thoughts as a general type of 'advice'. With respect [/QUOTE]

Verification