Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Silas Pradetto" data-source="post: 43042" data-attributes="member: 34">Re: M1d array correctionHey Phil,Could you expand on that? As far as I knew, the LF in an array isn&#039;t very directional, so turning down boxes, say, at the bottom of the array, are certainly not going to reduce the LF heard in the close seats. Instead, it&#039;s just going to totally screw up the array&#039;s overall performance.If I wanted to reduce LF in close seats, I&#039;d want the array to be as long as possible (read: no particular boxes turned down making the array effectively shorter) to keep the highest vertical directivity possible, thereby allowing the large forward-facing lobe to &#039;miss&#039; the seats below? Again, I&#039;ve never really done this in real life, I&#039;m just thinking aloud based on what I&#039;ve read.Edit: Phil, I think you&#039;re referring to something Galileo-specific, while I&#039;m probably using the wrong terminology to refer to general array behavior?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Silas Pradetto, post: 43042, member: 34"] Re: M1d array correction Hey Phil, Could you expand on that? As far as I knew, the LF in an array isn't very directional, so turning down boxes, say, at the bottom of the array, are certainly not going to reduce the LF heard in the close seats. Instead, it's just going to totally screw up the array's overall performance. If I wanted to reduce LF in close seats, I'd want the array to be as long as possible (read: no particular boxes turned down making the array effectively shorter) to keep the highest vertical directivity possible, thereby allowing the large forward-facing lobe to 'miss' the seats below? Again, I've never really done this in real life, I'm just thinking aloud based on what I've read. Edit: Phil, I think you're referring to something Galileo-specific, while I'm probably using the wrong terminology to refer to general array behavior? [/QUOTE]

Verification