Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Steve Hurt" data-source="post: 121560" data-attributes="member: 311">Re: Marc Lopez of Yamaha Commercial Audio Q&amp;AI&#039;m sure you are right Tim.&nbsp; Heck, I doubt the LS9 was designed for club sound either!I speak from my viewpoint (portable sound in clubs) and often forget the audience is much widerMarc sort of served it up as a possible replacement for the LS9 by saying:&nbsp; No question the QL looks to be much more advanced (and more than I need) The only thing I disagree with is that it&#039;s not in the same price range.Finally, I hope my comments aren&#039;t seen as disrespectful to Marc.&nbsp; I&#039;ve had very good experience with my LS9.&nbsp; It was always rock solid reliable.&nbsp; It had a feature set that no one else had anywhere near the cost when I bought it.&nbsp; And Yamaha responded to my e-mails when I asked for help.&nbsp; I appreciate his input here and if I did sound snarky, I apologize.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Steve Hurt, post: 121560, member: 311"] Re: Marc Lopez of Yamaha Commercial Audio Q&A I'm sure you are right Tim. Heck, I doubt the LS9 was designed for club sound either! I speak from my viewpoint (portable sound in clubs) and often forget the audience is much wider Marc sort of served it up as a possible replacement for the LS9 by saying: No question the QL looks to be much more advanced (and more than I need) The only thing I disagree with is that it's not in the same price range. Finally, I hope my comments aren't seen as disrespectful to Marc. I've had very good experience with my LS9. It was always rock solid reliable. It had a feature set that no one else had anywhere near the cost when I bought it. And Yamaha responded to my e-mails when I asked for help. I appreciate his input here and if I did sound snarky, I apologize. [/QUOTE]

Verification