Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Anthony Aquilato" data-source="post: 125531" data-attributes="member: 7895">Re: Marc Lopez of Yamaha Commercial Audio Q&amp;AThanks Scott. I&#039;ve also been reading on the ProSoundWeb about CL5. Trying to familiarize myself with the whole Dante thing, the networking and it&#039;s latency.Latency... is my next concern and set of questions. The published specs are based with the system running @ 48K. All the DSP power is based at that sample rate as is the round trip latency. Latency goes down as the sample rate is increased but DSP power is lowered. Just how much does the DSP get lowered?There isn&#039;t much I can find about that. Maybe Mark can chime in here? Does doubling the sample rate half the DSP?It seems that doubling the rate would make sense. At some point there will be IEMs involved with this set up and @ 96K the latency would be well below audible perception (if the published #s are correct). @ 48K it&#039;s questionable. Is there any published info about how much DSP is used for EFX, inserted GEQs, instances of the premium rack?Again, anyone reading alone that can provide any positive info regarding the questions above or system specs on a whole please feel to join.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Anthony Aquilato, post: 125531, member: 7895"] Re: Marc Lopez of Yamaha Commercial Audio Q&A Thanks Scott. I've also been reading on the ProSoundWeb about CL5. Trying to familiarize myself with the whole Dante thing, the networking and it's latency. Latency... is my next concern and set of questions. The published specs are based with the system running @ 48K. All the DSP power is based at that sample rate as is the round trip latency. Latency goes down as the sample rate is increased but DSP power is lowered. Just how much does the DSP get lowered? There isn't much I can find about that. Maybe Mark can chime in here? Does doubling the sample rate half the DSP? It seems that doubling the rate would make sense. At some point there will be IEMs involved with this set up and @ 96K the latency would be well below audible perception (if the published #s are correct). @ 48K it's questionable. Is there any published info about how much DSP is used for EFX, inserted GEQs, instances of the premium rack? Again, anyone reading alone that can provide any positive info regarding the questions above or system specs on a whole please feel to join. [/QUOTE]

Verification