Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
Maximum analog snake length
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="John Roberts" data-source="post: 89506" data-attributes="member: 126"><p>Re: Maximum analog snake length</p><p></p><p>To amplify Ivan's rant I draw a distinction between phenomenon that can actually make an audible difference in the margin, and phenomenon that while perhaps real do not ever make an audible difference. </p><p></p><p>This discussion of snake length correctly zero'd in on the real, lumped capacitance forming an RxC with products source impedance, issue and not the esoteric transmission line characteristic impedance and termination effects. It is the nature of internet forum discussions that people often post everything that they know on some subject, instead of just the pertinent information useful to the OP. This can get confusing when the real answer gets lost in the noise. </p><p></p><p>Ivan is correct that even these real effects must be kept in perspective. How many signals in that snake need a >20kHz passband? That said, a 5kHz LPF could very easily be audible, so some worst case consumer VCR fed through the snake with high capacitance wiring "could" make an audible difference. </p><p></p><p>I thought this thread was mostly reasonable and constructive, but know what Ivan is ranting about. I'm afraid it is the nature of the WWW and lurkers need to be selective about what they take from most threads. </p><p></p><p>JR</p><p></p><p>PS: Note the receiving end's input impedance is in parallel with the source impedance for RxC HF pole calculation, so results will be slightly better than using source impedance alone.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="John Roberts, post: 89506, member: 126"] Re: Maximum analog snake length To amplify Ivan's rant I draw a distinction between phenomenon that can actually make an audible difference in the margin, and phenomenon that while perhaps real do not ever make an audible difference. This discussion of snake length correctly zero'd in on the real, lumped capacitance forming an RxC with products source impedance, issue and not the esoteric transmission line characteristic impedance and termination effects. It is the nature of internet forum discussions that people often post everything that they know on some subject, instead of just the pertinent information useful to the OP. This can get confusing when the real answer gets lost in the noise. Ivan is correct that even these real effects must be kept in perspective. How many signals in that snake need a >20kHz passband? That said, a 5kHz LPF could very easily be audible, so some worst case consumer VCR fed through the snake with high capacitance wiring "could" make an audible difference. I thought this thread was mostly reasonable and constructive, but know what Ivan is ranting about. I'm afraid it is the nature of the WWW and lurkers need to be selective about what they take from most threads. JR PS: Note the receiving end's input impedance is in parallel with the source impedance for RxC HF pole calculation, so results will be slightly better than using source impedance alone. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
Maximum analog snake length
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!