Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Caleb Dueck" data-source="post: 98201" data-attributes="member: 60">Re: Midas exodus ?This is what I heard from Jay.&nbsp; The &#039;old guard&#039; has done well, they&#039;re happy with the &#039;new guard&#039;, now time to look for a company to pour their high-$$$ and new thinking capabilities into.&nbsp; If this is similar to what many other mixing companies have done, it makes sense.&nbsp; Start with a high dollar console, get some good names on board (company and users), recoup some R&amp;D, use that IP to release products scaled down at lower price points.&nbsp; Midas has Pro9 to Pro1, not much left downward anymore; SSL is just starting the process.&nbsp; It can get boring when the trailblazing is done, and all that&#039;s left is answer phones, fill orders, and train.&nbsp; Hence talking to Jay (after the switch), as that would have had potential to turn up &#039;dirt&#039; if that was the driving force for this.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Caleb Dueck, post: 98201, member: 60"] Re: Midas exodus ? This is what I heard from Jay. The 'old guard' has done well, they're happy with the 'new guard', now time to look for a company to pour their high-$$$ and new thinking capabilities into. If this is similar to what many other mixing companies have done, it makes sense. Start with a high dollar console, get some good names on board (company and users), recoup some R&D, use that IP to release products scaled down at lower price points. Midas has Pro9 to Pro1, not much left downward anymore; SSL is just starting the process. It can get boring when the trailblazing is done, and all that's left is answer phones, fill orders, and train. Hence talking to Jay (after the switch), as that would have had potential to turn up 'dirt' if that was the driving force for this. [/QUOTE]

Verification