Normal
Re: Mixology 201: EffectsSo I asked a loaded question, with my own answers in mind, and Phil and Art basically pegged them all. There are good reasons for doing both. The ease with which you can do them depends on the flexibility you have in routing.Now I wonder if anyone can come up with some additional reasons that haven't been mentioned.( I do use a special effect with a long delay that is the opposite of what Phil mentioned and the same as Art mentioned, where I bring up the input for a single word or phase or scat and then bring it back down leaving the long repeat underneath the next line of the song as a contrast)
Re: Mixology 201: Effects
So I asked a loaded question, with my own answers in mind, and Phil and Art basically pegged them all. There are good reasons for doing both. The ease with which you can do them depends on the flexibility you have in routing.
Now I wonder if anyone can come up with some additional reasons that haven't been mentioned.
( I do use a special effect with a long delay that is the opposite of what Phil mentioned and the same as Art mentioned, where I bring up the input for a single word or phase or scat and then bring it back down leaving the long repeat underneath the next line of the song as a contrast)