Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Modeling my pet peeve
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="John Roberts" data-source="post: 16475" data-attributes="member: 126"><p>Re: Modeling my pet peeve</p><p></p><p>Another potential difference between MI and more professional boxes is that the allowed production variance between drivers is larger. In a single box, X amount of driver variance is not that audible, but they you array them together, errors between the sundry boxes become more problematic. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I recall the difficulty in trying to explain to PV dealers why some more professional PV boxes cost more, they were sure we were overcharging them (we weren't).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>JR</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="John Roberts, post: 16475, member: 126"] Re: Modeling my pet peeve Another potential difference between MI and more professional boxes is that the allowed production variance between drivers is larger. In a single box, X amount of driver variance is not that audible, but they you array them together, errors between the sundry boxes become more problematic. I recall the difficulty in trying to explain to PV dealers why some more professional PV boxes cost more, they were sure we were overcharging them (we weren't). JR [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Modeling my pet peeve
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!