Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Modeling my pet peeve
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jay Barracato" data-source="post: 16592" data-attributes="member: 24"><p>Re: Modeling my pet peeve</p><p></p><p>I was really just playing with the modeling software. I don't think I was demonstrating anything anyone here is not familiar with. But I do think the pictures will be helpful next time I get caught in the 4 page discussion of ''I need more output so I am going to buy more...'' on the other boards.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I still think there are many rooms that can be well served by a well thought out trap rig. Actually, the pictures that Greg posted of his hang is probably a good example because you can clearly see each box is providing coverage for different areas.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I have absolutely no real scientific evidence but my gut feeling is that some of the higher frequency combing is actually part of what we experience as stereo (different time arrivals at each ear). Once again, what I was really trying to show was the whopping 30+ db of cancellation right in the middle of the guts of the sound (1000-2000 hz). Many of the cancellation areas are a couple of hundred of hz wide. Moving the mic in the model is a neat experiment that really shows you can move the cancellation around, in both location and frequency, but you can't get ride of it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jay Barracato, post: 16592, member: 24"] Re: Modeling my pet peeve I was really just playing with the modeling software. I don't think I was demonstrating anything anyone here is not familiar with. But I do think the pictures will be helpful next time I get caught in the 4 page discussion of ''I need more output so I am going to buy more...'' on the other boards. I still think there are many rooms that can be well served by a well thought out trap rig. Actually, the pictures that Greg posted of his hang is probably a good example because you can clearly see each box is providing coverage for different areas. I have absolutely no real scientific evidence but my gut feeling is that some of the higher frequency combing is actually part of what we experience as stereo (different time arrivals at each ear). Once again, what I was really trying to show was the whopping 30+ db of cancellation right in the middle of the guts of the sound (1000-2000 hz). Many of the cancellation areas are a couple of hundred of hz wide. Moving the mic in the model is a neat experiment that really shows you can move the cancellation around, in both location and frequency, but you can't get ride of it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Modeling my pet peeve
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!