Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ivan Beaver" data-source="post: 16609" data-attributes="member: 30">Re: Modeling my pet peeveThat is one area that is often stated-but is basically flawed.True- people do not usually go up and down in the coverage pattern (wihtout a ladder or being able to levitate <img src="http://www.soundforums.net/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" /> )-HOWEVER- they do go front to back <img src="http://www.soundforums.net/images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" /> Which puts them in different parts of the coverage pattern.And more people tend to walk from front to back and vice versa, than from side to side.If you look at the &#039;&#039;rows&#039;&#039; of coverage ripples with a line array-you will hear those as you walk from back to front.Just food for thought</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ivan Beaver, post: 16609, member: 30"] Re: Modeling my pet peeve That is one area that is often stated-but is basically flawed. True- people do not usually go up and down in the coverage pattern (wihtout a ladder or being able to levitate [img]http://www.soundforums.net/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif[/img] )-HOWEVER- they do go front to back [img]http://www.soundforums.net/images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif[/img] Which puts them in different parts of the coverage pattern. And more people tend to walk from front to back and vice versa, than from side to side. If you look at the ''rows'' of coverage ripples with a line array-you will hear those as you walk from back to front. Just food for thought [/QUOTE]

Verification