Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Modeling my pet peeve
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Greg Cameron" data-source="post: 16629" data-attributes="member: 42"><p>Re: Modeling my pet peeve</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah, the SLS is certainly not on par with the upper echelon line sources. That said, it's absolutely true the the HF waveguides from box to box aren't going to couple all that well. Hence the goal of tightening up coverage for minimal overlap whereas the lower frequency drivers will couple so long as they're within the fraction wavelength distance for summation. L'Acoustics came out of the gate with a very good design for their HF waveguide that a lot of the other guys have been trying to replicate the behavior of without infringing on patents. But there are some really good designs out their to minimize interference these days. And at the top of the array in a properly deployed system is where most of that interference is rather than at the bottom for the 'near-field' listeners where the boxes have more vertical splay. I've been very impressed with the latest systems, though I'm still impressed by well designed & deployed trap systems.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Greg</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Greg Cameron, post: 16629, member: 42"] Re: Modeling my pet peeve Yeah, the SLS is certainly not on par with the upper echelon line sources. That said, it's absolutely true the the HF waveguides from box to box aren't going to couple all that well. Hence the goal of tightening up coverage for minimal overlap whereas the lower frequency drivers will couple so long as they're within the fraction wavelength distance for summation. L'Acoustics came out of the gate with a very good design for their HF waveguide that a lot of the other guys have been trying to replicate the behavior of without infringing on patents. But there are some really good designs out their to minimize interference these days. And at the top of the array in a properly deployed system is where most of that interference is rather than at the bottom for the 'near-field' listeners where the boxes have more vertical splay. I've been very impressed with the latest systems, though I'm still impressed by well designed & deployed trap systems. Greg [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Modeling my pet peeve
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!