Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ivan Beaver" data-source="post: 34162" data-attributes="member: 30">Re: More Danley impressivenessThanks.&nbsp; It took me a good while to get that alignment.&nbsp; Not a 10 minute job. HA-HA. And I wasn&#039;t under the pressure of a gig starting <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />.BTW there are no &quot;special filters&quot;.&nbsp; Just normal EQ filters, normal high and low pass filters and delay as you would find on any DSP.&nbsp; However as Bennett has noted, the numbers don&#039;t always transfer to other brands of DSP.&nbsp; So it is ESSENTIAL to copy the transfer function if a different DSP is to be used.Now the way some of the filters are used may not be &quot;normal&quot;, but that is what is required to get the phase correct, which is more important than the amplitude response.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ivan Beaver, post: 34162, member: 30"] Re: More Danley impressiveness Thanks. It took me a good while to get that alignment. Not a 10 minute job. HA-HA. And I wasn't under the pressure of a gig starting :). BTW there are no "special filters". Just normal EQ filters, normal high and low pass filters and delay as you would find on any DSP. However as Bennett has noted, the numbers don't always transfer to other brands of DSP. So it is ESSENTIAL to copy the transfer function if a different DSP is to be used. Now the way some of the filters are used may not be "normal", but that is what is required to get the phase correct, which is more important than the amplitude response. [/QUOTE]

Verification