Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
More to a measurement then the transfer function?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Scott Helmke" data-source="post: 148936" data-attributes="member: 96"><p>Re: More to a measurement then the transfer function?</p><p></p><p>"Horn correction" type processing will not be happening so late as to be something you'd look at with impulse response. If anything you'd be looking for oddities in the phase trace of the transfer function. And of course all that fancy processing does come at a cost of overall latency. Your measurement mic might be 10 milliseconds from the speaker but the measured delay might add several more mS to that because of the latency.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Scott Helmke, post: 148936, member: 96"] Re: More to a measurement then the transfer function? "Horn correction" type processing will not be happening so late as to be something you'd look at with impulse response. If anything you'd be looking for oddities in the phase trace of the transfer function. And of course all that fancy processing does come at a cost of overall latency. Your measurement mic might be 10 milliseconds from the speaker but the measured delay might add several more mS to that because of the latency. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
More to a measurement then the transfer function?
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!
