YEAH-they don't know when to STOP MIXING![video=youtube_share;Jjb-rhxUxb8]https://youtu.be/Jjb-rhxUxb8[/video]
We've all been there.
YEAH-they don't know when to STOP MIXING!
Sometimes you just have to stop and let the "instrument" do its thing.
It is NOT a cake that you have to keep mixing----
This is probably my number one NOOB meter.... Unless your band sucks there is no reason to be in a constant state of tweak. It just shows you don't know what you're going for and you don't know how to get there...
This is probably my number one NOOB meter.... Unless your band sucks there is no reason to be in a constant state of tweak. It just shows you don't know what you're going for and you don't know how to get there...
Not necessarily in all cases. If the band is not balanced on stage from song to song or even more, my job gets harder if I want consistent production quality. I mix a modern country band where the singer doesn't have a low range or a lot of resonance in his voice. I ride him pretty constantly. Lead guitar has 5 instruments and literally hundreds of presets which vary wildly...I also ride him all the time. I change delay and drum and vocal verb settings per song. Backups need to be ducked as stage volume is loud.
I do however, have a very clear reference that I am working toward do nothing gets out of control. Obviously it needs to be discerning, but I find that my 'movements' make the mix more exciting and interesting from minute to minute. It's all about clarity, balance and getting the message across to first time listeners. Not for everyone.
And i agree with you completely. I overly simplified using the disclaimer 'unless your band sucks', but those kinds of issues were exactly what i was referring to.
When i first started mixing i found myself doing a lot of work to get less than satisfying results. But the more i did it the better i got at it until finally i got a job at a sound company with real gear and within just a few months i was getting truly stellar results. So i thought i had really come into my own with my skill set. in short, i thought i was a pretty great sound engineer.
But then i found myself mixing a local cover band one new year's eve because some of the members of the band happened to work in our sound company's install division. Suddenly i found myself back to chasing my tail all night trying to get it all to come together like it had for all the other acts i had mixed the previous year. It took me a while to get it, but i finally realized what had happened. Sure, i had gotten better in my skill set. But i had also moved from mixing local bands to mixing national acts. And national acts have talent and skills and know how to play well together. No wonder my results got so much better.
What i was really trying to illustrate was the guys i've seen that are all over the console all night responding to problems that don't exist. i used to see it all the time when i was a system tech watching the BE for a national act dig himself a hole.
Of course you also have the young guys now who spend the entire set buried in plugin menus while completely missing that the lead singer has changed or the guitarist is playing a [completely silent] mandolin on this song. but i digress....
Sure, i had gotten better in my skill set. But i had also moved from mixing local bands to mixing national acts. And national acts have talent and skills and know how to play well together. No wonder my results got so much better.
It still amuses me that people soundcheck the kickdrum for 15 minutes and the lead vocal for 15 seconds.
For you, for the band or for the engineer?My solution for both shitty bands and shitty engineers is another beer.
Evan
For you, for the band or for the engineer?