Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="John Roberts" data-source="post: 56872" data-attributes="member: 126">Re: MythbustingHe is technically accurate in what he said about the PS circuitry. Without knowing (and I don&#039;t really want to know) what the standard is for decorum on that forum, he does not appear to suffer fools graciously (like we do).&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":-)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :-)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":-)" />I would not discount his technical postings because he is not polite if I needed that particular information. I have run across his web pages often in technical searches and his writing is more often factually correct than wrong from my passing inspection. This is well above average for the WWW that high on noise and low on signal.&nbsp; JR</blockquote>

[QUOTE="John Roberts, post: 56872, member: 126"] Re: Mythbusting He is technically accurate in what he said about the PS circuitry. Without knowing (and I don't really want to know) what the standard is for decorum on that forum, he does not appear to suffer fools graciously (like we do). :-) I would not discount his technical postings because he is not polite if I needed that particular information. I have run across his web pages often in technical searches and his writing is more often factually correct than wrong from my passing inspection. This is well above average for the WWW that high on noise and low on signal. JR [/QUOTE]

Verification