Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
NAMM 2012 Reports and Photos
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Karl Winkler" data-source="post: 47792" data-attributes="member: 255"><p>Re: NAMM 2012 Reports and Photos</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>2.9 isn't all that outrageous compared to comparable stuff. Many digital wireless systems have 4 ms.</p><p></p><p>Our Digital Hybrid stuff is about the same price/channel as the Shure ULX-D, and is about the same latency (3.0 ms). </p><p></p><p>Our older 700 Series encrypted stuff (discontinued) was more expensive, but had 2.0 ms latency. </p><p></p><p>Quadra and D4 are more expensive and specialized, to be sure, but have 0.95 ms latency with analog ins/outs.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Karl Winkler, post: 47792, member: 255"] Re: NAMM 2012 Reports and Photos 2.9 isn't all that outrageous compared to comparable stuff. Many digital wireless systems have 4 ms. Our Digital Hybrid stuff is about the same price/channel as the Shure ULX-D, and is about the same latency (3.0 ms). Our older 700 Series encrypted stuff (discontinued) was more expensive, but had 2.0 ms latency. Quadra and D4 are more expensive and specialized, to be sure, but have 0.95 ms latency with analog ins/outs. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
NAMM 2012 Reports and Photos
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!
