Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
NAMM 2014 report
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chris Johnson" data-source="post: 114112" data-attributes="member: 975"><p>Re: NAMM 2014 report</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Why?</p><p></p><p>Surely given the choice between two equally performing systems, the simpler one (ie passive) always wins? not to mention it works out cheaper. Less amps = less $$$</p><p></p><p>Does that mean you would never use a D&B box? They are market leaders and all their mid-hi boxes have a passive crossover somewhere. Even J has a passive mid-hi...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chris Johnson, post: 114112, member: 975"] Re: NAMM 2014 report Why? Surely given the choice between two equally performing systems, the simpler one (ie passive) always wins? not to mention it works out cheaper. Less amps = less $$$ Does that mean you would never use a D&B box? They are market leaders and all their mid-hi boxes have a passive crossover somewhere. Even J has a passive mid-hi... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
NAMM 2014 report
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!
